First, please try to comprehend the state
I was in, all of what I was in the midst of trying to do, accept, prepare for,
think about - including the trauma and effort involved in accepting and agreeing
to the logic of "possible messages" I was receiving to 1) be prepared
for any possible scenario, 2) inventory all of my possessions and 3) make/pack
them in a way that would make them easy to be transported, with minimum
additional effort and in a way in which I would know how they were organized,
etc., etc., - when I suddenly received that email regarding the US Detains
Doubters article.
Not even being able to research, think
about what was meant, etc. of the venue for submission of a comment, I almost
immediately sent the following email in response (Illustration of what panic can
do > > keep in mind, that when I said "So far, I have not yet been
detained," I was referring to the detainment that had been recommended in
the OCE report, which was the one foremost in my mind, at the time):
Subject: Re: US detains doubters
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 03:11:21 -0400
From: Marianne LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
To: PRESS ESC <info@pressesc.com> References: 1
So far, I have not yet been detained,
but a great deal more has possibly surfaced involving this, at least as it
relates to the "local" area in which I reside - but who knows the
extent of those boundaries?
I learned, yesterday, that the next
court session, i.e., the date of the competency trial that will determine -
indications that, yes, it will most probably determine - my detainment is this
Tuesday, 4/26, versus this Wednesday, 4/27, which had been relayed to me, via
phone, on 4/1 (?) by the court mandated person "representing" me in
this. This information was only recently relayed to me, although I've been
requesting confirmation of the date since 4/6. And THAT is only part of what's
possibly surfaced.
Please let me know what specific
questions you have of me and/or if this is the email address to which I should
send any "community" emails that may be sent.
Regarding the rest of the statements in
your email, now, to me, to a certain extent, this is the first I'm hearing of
this. However, I try to relay what I find, in my research, that may relate to
this, so that others may also pursue this. Dynacorp, incidently, if I recall,
tied to either or both VP Cheney and to the local area in which I reside,
i.e., southeastern CT - too late in the night, and me needing too much sleep
right now, to try to remember/look up/relay actual particulars - was uncovered
in my research probably about November 2004 and possible due to a message I
may have received.
As far as it involving "illegal
immigrants," as far as "illegal" that depends on how the
illegality of their situation is defined. However, an overwhelming number of
the possible victims of which I am aware are natives to this country and are,
in fact, very local to our area.
What is evidently happening in our area
has been likened to me by others as very similar to what was happening in
Germany during Hitler's rise. One person, who very clearly articulated this to
me, is someone of German descent who's family had lived in Germany during that
period. The person told me of how older family members were trying to stress
this and I got the impression that there had been an urgency to relay this to
me.
This is all very scary and needs being
aired, investigated and fought. Please let me know to whom I may relay what,
at least, I may be "seeing," etc..
Marianne LaBrecque
[my cellphone#]
On 05/02/05, evidently, I also posted the
following comment on that website, which, unfortunately, appears on that website
partially scrambled at the end, but, again, I was having to operate "on the
fly" so to speak:
Documentation relating to this
Written by Guest on 2005-05-02 13:41:53
As requested, my comments re: statements
in this article:
Documentation:
August 2004 detainment: http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/PondHouseRpts.htm
March 2005 CT OCE report: http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/030905_OCE_report.htm
CT Superior Court# CR 03-0274020-S, CR 03-0272043-S, MV03-0657247-S
Various Towns' of Stonington, Waterford and Groton, CT Police Reports relating
to me.
FBI New Haven and FBI HQ's files relating to me.
Related court case: United States District Court, District Of Connecticut:
Elizabeth A. Marczeski v. Susan B. Handy, Sara Steere, Patrick K. Fox, M.D.,
Bruce Knox, Pramodini Desphande, M.D., Mark Puglisi, Vincent Franco And
Garrell Mullaney www.ctd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/090904.HBF.Marczeski.pdf
Competency trial to determine detainment
relating to the OCE report has not yet been held. However, I've been refused
my constitutional right to represent myself in my defense and have been,
instead, ordered by the judge to be represented by someone selected by the
court.
The crime is human trafficking, which
may also include human smuggling, but doesn't always. It is described in
sections under 18USC CHAPTER 77, but there a number of other federal
violations usually associated with these activities. For example, some of the
activities that appear to be supporting this crime may also fall under
Domestic Terrorism as defined by 18 USC CHAPTER 113B.
Human Trafficking: A Growing Criminal
Market in the U.S., www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/international/ht.html,
by James O. Finckenauer and Jennifer Schrock, International Center, National
Institute of Justice, The Research, Development and Evaluation Agency of the
U.S. Department of Justice, United Nations Activities, reported
"A review of cases since 1990
found that traffickers in the U.S. tended to be smaller crime groups and
trafficking rings, gangs, loosely organized criminal networks, entrepreneurs
and corrupt individuals who were victimizing their own nationals (Richard,
1999)"
An overwhelming number of the possible
victims of whom I am aware are natives to the U.S. and are, in fact, very
local to our area. Perpetrators may be long time members of the community.
I am interpreting
"Government," as used in this article, to possibly be defined as
corrupt components/members of various levels of government.
Other than what I read about through
this article, I was not aware of any statements it includes as being made by
psychiatrists.
Information I've published may be found
by doing an internet search for my name.
Marianne LaBrecque
[Note: this is adapted from the page I've
copied of that website because I can't find my own copy of this response, right
now.]
Re: U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney
Also see information in - can't find the community email that included
this, and
there may not be one, but trace the history, if possible, of CSC (Computer
Systems Corporation) particularly how it ties to the SE Connecticut area,
specifically Electric Boat Division of General Dynamics and then the
relationship of that company to DynCorp and, in turn, the relationship of That
company to Haliburton (sp?) and the well-known/publicized relationship of U.S.
Vice President Dick Cheney to That company. (Yes, very unfortunate that I can't
even begin to think about trying to find my actual notes, previous emails, etc.,
regarding this, but will try to provide follow-up information in a later email.
However, keep in mind that I STILL haven't completed the other part(s) of 02/17/04 - crazy > integrity - Pt 1
[modified & reformated] and
never got to finish and send/publish "no pussyfooting.")
However, again, regarding U.S. Vice
President Dick Cheney, it should be recalled that, all through the investigation
involving these efforts, instances were uncovered in which
"management" and/or business owners had no idea that their department,
company, establishment, etc., was most possibly being used for human trafficking
activities and/or for protecting and supporting that crime. Trying to get them
to consider this possibility almost always became an illustration of the
"not on my shift" syndrome. (I can't even BEGIN to go on about all the
issues all included in this paragraph relates to!!!!)
And, back again to the US
Detains Doubters article, I can't readily find when I submitted it - it
appears to have possibly been 05/17/05, the day scheduled for my competency
trial, but the following is the response to an online email I sent to that
website:
Subject: Copy of: URGENT need to contact
John Hashcrop
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:35:36 -0400
From: Press Esc <info@pressesc.com>
To: marianne-lbrqu@att.net
This is a copy of the following message
you sent to R. Deshapriya via PressEsc
This is an enquiry e-mail via http://unspun.mithuro.com
from: Marianne LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
Please try to facilitate my contact of
John Hashcrop.
Also please keep me informed of any
additional information, substantiated or otherwise, that you may receive
relating to that in which I am involved.
Collaboration, such as this, is very
much needed in this fight, and I would greatly appreciate any help you may
be able and willing to provide.
Unfortunately, right now I am only
sporadically "in touch" electronically.
